Illustrate the connection between Model Rule 1.1 and other (more established) rules such as Model Rules 1.5, 1.6, 5.1, and 5.3, to show that even though the new Model Rule 1.1 has not yet been adopted in all 50 states, and has few cases and ethics opinions interpreting it, it is a rule to be taken seriously. Uncover how incompetent use of basic office software may have more implications beyond technology competence, and may lead to overbilling clients. Discuss the duty of technology competence and its requirements, and dispel common myths. Examples and discussion will focus on MS Word in legal practice. Ivy will also explore how Model Rules 1.6, 5.1, and 5.3 interact with Model Rule 1.1. How refusal to embrace technology can become an ethical issue, and lead to overbilling clients (Model Rule 1.5). The implications of the forward-looking nature of Model Rule 1.1 and. The duty of technology competence as it relates to technology used in practice (Model Rule 1.1). Competence includes the substance of the legal work and the technology used to provide legal services to clients. 
Lawyers have an ethical obligation to competently represent their clients. Vice President of Strategy & Business Development, WordRake Technology Competence: A Practical Guide to Your Duties
0 kommentar(er)
